People misbehaved in Delhi BECAUSE police was not there!-news report

Indo-Asian News Service (January 02, 2012 19:23 IST) informs its readers (http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/new-year-hooliganism-due-to-lack-of-cops-gurgaon-residents-162951&cp):

Gurgaon: The drunken hooliganism witnessed here during New Year celebrations, when hundreds of revellers created ruckus on the Mehrauli-Gurgaon Road and even molested a woman, occurred due to shortage of police personnel, eyewitnesses said on Monday.

Now it is a remarkable proposition for a free democratic society: the witnesses find the reason for molestation of women to be the absence of police to prevent such behavior. Even more remarkable is the fact the reporter accepted and reported this explanation on the news wire. Perhaps Justice Katju, the chair of Press Council of India is right after all.

Why Has the Indian Retail Sector not Modernized?

In the recent controversy about foreign direct investment in the retail sector, the conspicuous failure of Indian entrepreneurs to modernize the industry has remained largely unaddressed.  An efficient supply chain linking producers to consumers calls for a commercial code, business relationships, reputation of products and their brands, transportation, warehousing, financing, and software to operate and control the system. But all these elements are already present or available in India. Why does India need a Walmart to lower the prices its consumers pay? And therein lies a tale.

Efficient mass merchandizing calls for a large scale with hundreds if not thousands of outlets. Control of large networks requires stocking and pricing policies, software for managing logistics and transactions, as well as databases in which all goods and related events throughout the network, including billions of transactions, are captured and permanently recorded in a traceable and auditable manner. Integrity of these databases, being crucial for the ability of the management to identify bottlenecks and remove inefficiencies, is jealously guarded.

The system that serves to manage large retail organizations is also convenient for the tax payment and collection. Complete record of goods, cash, and transactions facilitates easy and fast preparation of internal and external financial reports as well as returns for sales, income and any other taxes. The system creates a difficult-to-manipulate audit trail making it easier for management to track any misappropriation of inventories or cash handled by thousands of employees in locations spread across the country. Further, it is easier for the independent auditors of financial reports (for publicly-held firms) and for the government tax auditors to verify the records. Integration of large scale operations and the information system designed to serve them is essential to their efficiency. For example, this system may enable a chain with thousands of stores to track the sale and inventory of each of their tens of thousands of items in real time, and request vendors to ship additional supplies to locations as needed within minutes.

Efficient operation of such an integrated system has two simple requirements: a pricing policy and tax payment. Without a pricing policy, each interaction with customers presents an opportunity to bargain. Bargaining can allow the seller to price discriminate (charge a higher price from customers who place a higher value on the good) and thus earn higher profits. However, in a chain of stores where the owner cannot be present to do the bargaining with every customer, the risk of moral hazard associated with delegating the bargaining function to hired employees becomes too large. Most Indian retailers either do not post their prices, and even when they do, the prices are subject to bargaining by customers who know better. Retailers think that the advantages of extracting a higher price from some customers outweigh the consequences of limiting themselves to a mere handful of stores managed by trusted employees or family members.

Payment of sales, income and other taxes is an even greater barrier to modernization of retail industry in India. By not recording purchase and sale transactions, or recording them selectively in two separate sets of books, is a common method of evading taxes in many parts of the world. India is no exception. Modernization of retail industry, accompanied by integrated and transparent information systems, makes it easier for governments to collect their due. Operator of a large chain who asks the employees to evade taxes becomes susceptible for pressure and blackmail by employees. It is not surprising that entrepreneurs often take the simpler route of keeping their operations small enough to manage through direct personal supervision.

Indian retailers can and should break out of the self-defeating confines of the beliefs about the profitability of tax evasion and bargaining with individual customers. When they do, they can earn much larger total profits on higher sales volume from expanded operations in spite of narrower margins. Narrowed margins, combined with economies of scale of operations, and expanded bargaining power vis-a-vis producers will enable them to lower the price to consumers. Consumers will respond to lower prices by buying more, and increasing total profits of retailers.

It may take entry of foreign retailers to alter the beliefs of Indian retailers about their business model. Once that happens, Indian retailers can be expected to develop modern chains of their own; they may even take their business abroad. If they do, Walmart may have to watch out for its own territory.

TheMint, January 9, 2011

Higher Education Reforms in India

The number of institutions and enrollment in higher education continue their rapid growth, but the quality of this education remains uncertain. A small number of state-subsidized institutions attract a thin top layer of talent from each year's cohort. High selectivity of admission to these elite institutions provides a screen valued by potential employers. Domestic and foreign demand for the services of these few thousand students has created an inflated reputation of the overall quality of India's higher education. The number of such graduates remains small relative to the population and the demands of India's economy for educated manpower. Reliable estimates of value-added by higher education, beyond the screening value of admission to elite institutions, are needed to assess colleges and universities, and to guide educational policy.

Graduate education - the seed farm of higher education and scholarship - continues in an alarming state of disarray with respect to both quality and quantity. Pressed by budgetary constraints, the government appears to have decided on profit-oriented privatization of higher education as the solution. Political and business classes, with significant overlap between the two, see higher education as a source of lucrative private returns on investment. There is little theoretical or empirical evidence that supports the prospects of success of a for-profit model in building quality higher education. Some recent proposals hold promise of radical reform and renovation, including regulatory restructuring. It remains unclear whether the government has the wisdom, determination, financing, and power to push reforms past the resistance from entrenched faculty and from the political and business classes.

This is an abstract of a longer paper available for download: Sunder, Shyam, Higher Education Reforms in India (June 28, 2010). Yale SOM Working Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1652277